中国历史吧 关注:856,746贴子:4,092,292

回复:1949年中印主要工农业产品产量

只看楼主收藏回复

回复:442楼
你也稍微看一下刚才讨论的主题吧。。。


447楼2011-01-03 01:50
回复
    回复:444楼
    我不知道这帖子有些人是为啥,本贴本来是为了论证本朝统一比民国优越,又不是想要否定78年,不知道有些人为啥这么敏感


    448楼2011-01-03 01:50
    回复
      2026-04-30 18:29:30
      广告
      不感兴趣
      开通SVIP免广告
      回复:448楼
      否定78年后,少打了几个字


      449楼2011-01-03 01:50
      回复
        回复:446楼
        哦。。。不说要占领别人的高端市场了?开始扯到和不如中国的国家开始比了是吧。
        还有,大学生小学生什么的原来不是教育方面啊,算我孤陋寡闻了。


        450楼2011-01-03 01:51
        回复
          回复:448楼
          有的人见不得中国和外国比。比强比弱都有不开心的。


          451楼2011-01-03 01:53
          回复
            回复:450楼
            这个比喻很形象,你对其中的内容有意见吗?


            452楼2011-01-03 01:54
            回复
              再看看这个

              这个领域,中国领先世界。


              453楼2011-01-03 01:56
              回复
                有的人,眼中见不得说中国不好,所以就算给出了官方数据,也能编排数据的不是。刚才还信誓旦旦的谈着占领世界的高端市场,一转眼就开始说尽管某项技术不如美国,但是世界上还不如中国的国家多了去了。


                454楼2011-01-03 01:57
                回复
                  2026-04-30 18:23:30
                  广告
                  不感兴趣
                  开通SVIP免广告
                  这也叫没有核心技术吗?


                  455楼2011-01-03 01:57
                  回复
                    回复:454楼
                    现在:
                    美国博导,日本博士,中国高中
                    这个问题,你有意见吗?中国不如发达国家,我否定过吗?中国的在发展,这是我一直在强调的,中国的经济结构一直在变化,我们辩论的核心,我举出这些例子不就是说明,中国正在向高端走吗 ?


                    456楼2011-01-03 01:59
                    回复
                      回复:454楼
                      中国是逐渐在向高端领域进发,这个没有问题吧。要一下子超越有百年技术积累的西方国家也不是短期内完成的。但不可否认中国这几年在高端领域的突破


                      457楼2011-01-03 02:00
                      回复
                        回复:454楼
                        数据这个东西是很容易骗人的,也很容易找出破绽,所以提数据的时候务必要好好想想,他统计局有什么本事能估出1949年的GDP了?


                        458楼2011-01-03 02:02
                        回复
                          回复:453楼
                          Pebble bed reactor
                          The technology was first developed in Germany[1] but political and economic decisions were made to abandon the technology.[2] In various forms, it is currently under development by MIT, University of California at Berkeley, the South African company PBMR, General Atomics (U.S.), the Dutch company Romawa B.V., Adams Atomic Engines [1], Idaho National Laboratory, and the Chinese company Huaneng.[3]
                          Stationary
                          China
                          China has licensed the German technology and is actively developing a pebble bed reactor for power generation.[19] The 10 megawatt prototype is called the HTR-10. It is a conventional helium-cooled, helium-turbine design. The program is at Tsinghua University in Beijing. The first 250-MWt plant is scheduled to begin construction in 2009 and commissioning in 2013.[20] There are firm plans for thirty such plants by 2020 (6 gigawatts). By 2050, China plans to deploy as much as 300 gigawatts of reactors of which PBMRs will be a major component. If PBMRs are successful, there may be a substantial number of reactors deployed. This may be the largest planned nuclear power deployment in history.
                          Tsinghua's program for Nuclear and New Energy technology also plans in 2006 to begin developing a system to use the high temperature gas of a pebble bed reactor to crack steam to produce hydrogen. The hydrogen could serve as fuel for hydrogen vehicles, reducing China's dependence on imported oil. Hydrogen can also be stored, and distribution by pipelines may be more efficient than conventional power lines. See hydrogen economy.
                          


                          459楼2011-01-03 02:04
                          回复
                            回复:459楼
                            西方很多国家工业化过程也是从山寨他人技术开始的,再说山寨也不是件容易事,你说现在有几个国家能山寨出核潜艇?如果中国现在登月了,难道因为美国已经登月过了所以说这个不是高端了?


                            461楼2011-01-03 02:08
                            回复