f1吧 关注:379,343贴子:14,778,235

新闻学魅力时刻

只看楼主收藏回复

nor的sky采访原话: “也许只是因为大家太惊讶了。大多数练习/排位赛阶段,他们的速度和我们差不多;比赛时,他们也能追上我们。可偏偏因为我们在FP时最快,人们就不断搬出各种乱七八糟的说辞。他们爱怎么说就怎么说,我们才不信领先非常多。况且,如果max今天没有那五秒罚时,他大概才是全场最快的。所以我们还有很多功课要做。人们总说我们最好、最快之类的,完全是因为我们在练习时展示了更多的速度,然后到了排位赛就没招了。但那就是我们的工作方式——我们觉得这样优化最合适。如果换种方式做,我们可能会落得更惨。所以,总的来说,我对我们的工作状态很满意。大家只需要重新认识一下:我们确实有一辆很棒的赛车,平均来看当然可能是最快的,但显然还不够。”
《max今天是最快的》《我们有最快的车》到了媒体这边去头去尾变成《max有最快的车》了 xd 媒体瞎编网民瞎搬
“So is it just that people are so surprised. They’re just as quick in qualifying in most sessions. They’re just as quick as us in the race. People, just because we’re quick in practice, keep coming up with all this crap. And no, I mean, they can keep doing what they want. We don’t believe we’re much ahead, as it shows. I think probably Max was the quickest out there today if he didn’t have that five‑second penalty. So we have work to do. People keep saying that we’re the best, we’re the quickest, blah blah blah, but it’s just because we show a bit more pace in practice and then we’ve got nothing left when it gets to qualifying – but that’s our way of doing things. That’s how we feel; we optimise things. If we didn’t do it that way, we’d be even further back. So no, I’m happy with the work we’re doing. People just need to recalibrate that we’re not – you know, we have a great car and probably the quickest on average for sure, but clearly not enough.”


IP属地:日本来自iPhone客户端1楼2025-04-21 18:56回复
    也可能诺里斯的含义是 迈凯轮还没有快到 让他在排位赛拉了坨大的后 从车阵迅速超到前二的程度


    IP属地:山东来自iPhone客户端2楼2025-04-21 19:02
    收起回复
      2025-12-20 06:57:39
      广告
      不感兴趣
      开通SVIP免广告
      f1里除了视频画面采访别的转载一概都不能信
      之前还有p图去p阿隆索和纽威那种autosport的采访语言文字的图片,还好多人拿来当拉踩证据


      IP属地:河南来自Android客户端3楼2025-04-21 19:03
      收起回复
        不这样翻译怎么有流量呢,不这样翻译怎么会有讨论度


        IP属地:广东来自Android客户端5楼2025-04-21 20:03
        收起回复
          这小丑🤡🤡🤡🤡


          IP属地:广西来自iPhone客户端6楼2025-04-21 20:24
          回复


            IP属地:福建来自iPhone客户端7楼2025-04-21 20:34
            回复
              叫阿诺傻傻的,学下人阿潘怎么回答的。下次说想回家🦌管了。


              IP属地:广东来自Android客户端8楼2025-04-21 20:46
              回复
                人家标题写的是“红牛赛车是今天最快的赛车”,不就是他采访里的意思吗?


                IP属地:北京来自Android客户端9楼2025-04-21 20:49
                收起回复
                  2025-12-20 06:51:39
                  广告
                  不感兴趣
                  开通SVIP免广告
                  你这采访原话哪有洗干净,不还是没罚时潘子最快这样暗戳戳的,平均最快然后还是不够,车真不够吗,除了脏空气敏感哪里不够


                  IP属地:浙江来自Android客户端10楼2025-04-21 21:06
                  收起回复
                    这不还是解释了兰多说红牛的车最快吗


                    IP属地:浙江来自Android客户端11楼2025-04-21 21:38
                    收起回复
                      这意思不还是这站潘子更快么
                      I think probably Max was the quickest out there today if he didn’t have that five‑second penalty.


                      IP属地:湖北来自Android客户端12楼2025-04-21 21:53
                      收起回复
                        ?怎么变成瞎搬了 Q: Norris has just said in the pen that he thinks the Red Bull was the fastest car today. Do you agree with him?
                        OP: No. I think our car was still quicker. I think it was difficult to be in dirty air. Max was quicker than I expected for sure in the race. I thought over one lap it wasn't a huge surprise to see Max quick, but in the race, I wasn't expecting to struggle so much at the end of the Medium stint, that's for sure. So clearly we've got some work to do. I think our car is still very good, but when you look at the layout here compared to Suzuka, it's the most similar so far, and it's been the two where Max and Red Bull have been closer. I think we still have an advantage. I don't think it's as big on surfaces like this and layouts like this, but we still have a very strong car at the moment.


                        IP属地:澳大利亚来自iPhone客户端13楼2025-04-21 23:17
                        收起回复
                          说实话,看诺里斯采访视频和文字观感差别很大。看文字青蛙特别喜欢嘴炮乱说话、自大又自卑,看视频就会发现青蛙先是车轱辘话然后被记者牵着鼻子走,谐得不行,终于明白为什么经常是投票冠军了


                          IP属地:江苏来自Android客户端14楼2025-04-22 00:34
                          收起回复
                            支持


                            IP属地:江苏16楼2025-04-22 01:32
                            回复