字有点多，我发两段：
---
English ver:
**Subject: Concerns Regarding Systematic Underperformance and Bias Against Chinese Vehicles in War Thunder**
Dear War Thunder Development Team,
We write to express profound disappointment with the persistent misrepresentation of Chinese military assets in your game, particularly regarding the VT5 Lightweight MBT tank's armor mechanics. Available technical specifications and expert analyses clearly demonstrate the VT5's composite armor configuration, yet its in-game implementation fails to reflect documented protective capabilities. This discrepancy undermines both gameplay balance and historical authenticity.
Of greater concern is the pattern of dismissing verifiable evidence through official channels. Multiple community-submitted documents - including manufacturer specifications and ballistic test data - have been summarily rejected without technical counterarguments. This closed-door approach contradicts War Thunder's celebrated commitment to "documentation-based vehicle design" and erodes player trust in the fairness of your verification process.A 33-ton combat weight tank exhibiting inferior base armor protection compared to the 24-ton ZBD04A IFV？

第二段：
This issue extends beyond the VT5. Comparative analysis reveals consistent statistical deviations across multiple Chinese vehicles (both ground and aerial), where performance metrics frequently fall 15-20% below peer vehicles from other nations despite comparable real-world capabilities. The cumulative effect creates a distorted technological narrative that does disservice to your international player base.
We urge immediate action to:
1. Re-evaluate VT5's armor modeling using declassified technical reports
2. Implement transparent evidence review protocols for community submissions
3. Conduct parity audits across all Chinese tech tree vehicles
As loyal players who deeply appreciate War Thunder's technical ambition, we believe addressing these concerns will strengthen the game's reputation as a militarily authentic cross-cultural platform. We welcome open dialogue to resolve these issues constructively.
Sincerely,
[Your Player Community]
---

中文翻译：
chinese ver（中文版本）：
主题：关于《战争雷霆》中中国载具系统性性能弱化及偏见的严正关切**
致战争雷霆开发团队：
我们谨此对贵方长期不实呈现中国军事载具的做法表示深感失望，特别是关于VT5 轻量化主战坦克的装甲机制问题。现有技术参数和专家分析均明确指出VT5的复合装甲结构，然而游戏内的实现完全未能反映其文献记载的防护能力。这种差异既损害了游戏平衡性，也违背了历史真实性。
更令人担忧的是贵方通过官方渠道系统性驳回可验证证据的行为。玩家社区多次提交的制造商技术规格书、弹道测试数据等文件均遭断然拒绝，且未提供任何技术性反驳论据。这种封闭态度与贵方标榜的"基于文献的载具设计"承诺背道而驰，严重削弱了玩家对审核流程公正性的信任。谁能相信裸装 33 吨重的坦克，防护性能还不如 zbd04a 步兵战车？
该问题远不止于VT5。对比分析表明，中国科技树载具（含空中单位）普遍存在系统性数值偏差，其实战能力与同类外国载具相当时，游戏参数却持续低于15-20%。这种累积效应正在扭曲技术演进的真实叙事，对贵方的国际玩家社群造成伤害。
我们敦促贵方立即采取以下措施：
1. 依据解密技术报告重新评估VT5装甲模型
2. 建立透明的玩家证据审核机制
3. 对中国科技树全系载具开展性能平衡审查
作为深度认可《战争雷霆》技术追求的核心玩家，我们相信解决这些问题将巩固游戏作为军事文化平台的国际公信力。我们期待就此展开建设性对话。
此致
[您的玩家社群]
---

我想发但论坛提示我近期不活跃无法发送最好能像我截图最后@stone-wt，艾特后面输入stone就能选择他了

这是我现在玩的牢冲队列

斯拉夫-/真的气煞我也，踢皮球踢起来了

好消息vt5加了内衬和提升了一点装甲
坏消息发动机和装弹后脑勺仍然可以被12.7穿，而且论坛号还给禁言了

来人啊 xdm

不转发的话来一块儿骂两句也行啊看到之前网友对斯拉夫-/的评论：敬告管理员:掩耳盗铃并不能使精神祖国变得更加强大，坐井观天只能让浅薄思想愈发狭隘。

咋弄啊，没整过

顶

踏马的逆天阿尔维斯搁那诡辩真的气死个人，这人是管理员还是什么东西？

不用了 xdm，打了两三把战雷能发言了，狠狠怼了那个阿尔维斯狐狸头

把你号封了