我想西洋大老的文章已经有足够的档案说明高战和战巡的异同 与流变考
只是西洋大老的资料以英国为主(当然英国是战巡创始国 其定位当然是最重要的)
但是如果放在不同国家的脉络下讨论 是否会有不同? 特别是近代一般人对于舰种的观念很多受到美国人的影响
如我看到“THE CAVALRY OF THE FLEET:” ORGANIZATION, DOCTRINE, AND BATTLECRUISERS IN
THE UNITED STATES AND THE UNITED KINGDOM, 1904-22
一文中对于美国列克星顿设计后期的发展的部分
Chief Constructor Taylor受到胡德的影响 开始思考铁乌龟和薄皮战巡之外的可能
By May 10, the designs were finished and Taylor, presumably, set out to convince the heads of Steam Engineering and Ordnance of the wisdom of the hybrid, soon dubbed a “fast battleship.”
suggested the possibility of a hybrid along the lines of Hood: a fast,moderately armored, battleship that could replace both types
technical Bureaus在Memo中提出的两个设计案
memo strongly suggested that the time had come to amalgamate the battleship and battlecruiser classes into “a high-speed battleship, or a heavily armed and armored battle cruiser as preferred."
Memo也提出 应该合并战列舰和战巡两种舰种 变成高速战舰或重甲战巡
不过之后合并舰种的意见被回绝
是否可以认为在美国的概念下 高速战舰是个比较晚生的概念 (基于胡德诞生 所以跟美国战巡的定义还是有差别?
记得西洋大老也提过 在英国外的国家 对于战巡的定义其实也都有自己的看法
附带一提 美国此时也有个激进派Stirling
Stirling went one step further, though, taking the Fisherite position that the greater speed of battlecruisers gave them the advantage in these sorts of long-range gunnery duels, eventually forcing a merging of the two types into an unarmored ship of about 40,000 tons with twelve 14” guns, any armor being “weight wasted,” at combat ranges.
抱怨一下 百度现在都没有自动繁转简 好麻烦
只是西洋大老的资料以英国为主(当然英国是战巡创始国 其定位当然是最重要的)
但是如果放在不同国家的脉络下讨论 是否会有不同? 特别是近代一般人对于舰种的观念很多受到美国人的影响
如我看到“THE CAVALRY OF THE FLEET:” ORGANIZATION, DOCTRINE, AND BATTLECRUISERS IN
THE UNITED STATES AND THE UNITED KINGDOM, 1904-22
一文中对于美国列克星顿设计后期的发展的部分
Chief Constructor Taylor受到胡德的影响 开始思考铁乌龟和薄皮战巡之外的可能
By May 10, the designs were finished and Taylor, presumably, set out to convince the heads of Steam Engineering and Ordnance of the wisdom of the hybrid, soon dubbed a “fast battleship.”
suggested the possibility of a hybrid along the lines of Hood: a fast,moderately armored, battleship that could replace both types
technical Bureaus在Memo中提出的两个设计案
memo strongly suggested that the time had come to amalgamate the battleship and battlecruiser classes into “a high-speed battleship, or a heavily armed and armored battle cruiser as preferred."
Memo也提出 应该合并战列舰和战巡两种舰种 变成高速战舰或重甲战巡
不过之后合并舰种的意见被回绝
是否可以认为在美国的概念下 高速战舰是个比较晚生的概念 (基于胡德诞生 所以跟美国战巡的定义还是有差别?
记得西洋大老也提过 在英国外的国家 对于战巡的定义其实也都有自己的看法
附带一提 美国此时也有个激进派Stirling
Stirling went one step further, though, taking the Fisherite position that the greater speed of battlecruisers gave them the advantage in these sorts of long-range gunnery duels, eventually forcing a merging of the two types into an unarmored ship of about 40,000 tons with twelve 14” guns, any armor being “weight wasted,” at combat ranges.
抱怨一下 百度现在都没有自动繁转简 好麻烦
