战舰世界吧 关注:746,179贴子:25,772,022

4.17Q&A 久违的QA

只看楼主收藏回复

本次QA主要关注于分房机制的卫星计划
感谢贴吧情报组
懒得找镇楼图了,凑合着看吧


IP属地:海南1楼2018-04-17 21:46回复
    A small World of Warships Q&A with Wellone, conducted atLesta Studios. Please bear in mind this was translated from Russian and theremight be some errors.
    小QA,俄语转英语再转汉语,中间有偏差请谅解


    IP属地:海南2楼2018-04-17 21:46
    收起回复
      2026-01-07 11:20:46
      广告
      不感兴趣
      开通SVIP免广告
      -For this moment work of matchmaker is fine for us. It isfairer than tanks. But we can do some updates for him. Not announcement, justdesires!
      目前匹配机制我们认为很好了,要比坦克的更加公平,但是我们希望能够做的更好


      IP属地:海南3楼2018-04-17 21:46
      回复(9)
        -Elimination of situations where ships of low tiers fall “onthe surrender” in battles with the tiers above. This is not the right situationand I would like to see the situation when in the top 2-4 ships, and low tiersof at least 4 pieces. So that everyone in the battle had antagonists with whichhe could kill.
        我们希望消除壮丁房所带来的绝望。希望能够做到顶级船2-4条,低级船至少四条,这样可以菜鸡互啄。当然这只是个人的想法


        IP属地:海南4楼2018-04-17 21:46
        收起回复
          直播?


          IP属地:浙江来自Android客户端5楼2018-04-17 21:46
          回复
            -Elimination of the problem “by 1-2-3”. This is when playersfrom one Clan go into battle on the score and fall into the same fight. I donot say that there are many such cases, but when they happen this clearly canbring discomfort. In the future, we plan to avoid such a situation. If playersfrom the same clan push the button “into battle” without being in the unit –they will throw in different fights.
            避免同一个军团的车队卡房,虽然说不是很常见,但是这种情况一旦发生了大家都不爽。所以在未来,我们计划避免这种现象的发生,同一军团的玩家不会被分到同一场战斗中。


            IP属地:海南6楼2018-04-17 21:46
            回复(7)
              -Four DD limit. This is not a strict restriction, and ifthere are destroyers waiting in the queue for too long – this restriction willbe discarded. But in the total mass of battles with 5+ DD will be much less.
              4DD的限制。并不会严格限制DD在这个数量以为,如果太多DD在排队的话也不会考虑这个限制了。但是总的来说5条以上DD的情况会少很多。


              IP属地:海南7楼2018-04-17 21:47
              回复(5)
                -Nation and Tier balance. We always have nation rules, butwe want to add Tier rules to it also.
                国别与等级的平衡。我们已经有了国家之间的平衡规则,同时也希望加入等级平衡的规则。


                IP属地:海南8楼2018-04-17 21:47
                收起回复
                  2026-01-07 11:14:46
                  广告
                  不感兴趣
                  开通SVIP免广告
                  可惜不更新,凉凉


                  IP属地:湖南来自iPhone客户端10楼2018-04-17 21:47
                  回复
                    -There are no plans to +1/-1 MM. Each ship can kill other.Nagato has more chances to kill Ibuki than to die.
                    ±1级分房别想了,每个船都能够击沉对方。长门在被伊吹洗死之前实际上有更多机会直接送她回港。


                    IP属地:海南11楼2018-04-17 21:47
                    收起回复
                      -But class balance will be improved. Rock-Paper-Scissors ineach battle.
                      舰种之间的平衡性将会改进,还是遵循石头剪刀布的原则。


                      IP属地:海南12楼2018-04-17 21:47
                      收起回复
                        -AP penetration without damage will be fixed. Suchsituations when some shell pierces the anti-torpedo bulb (and there is no XP),it reaches the main armoured field and there is no more penetration on it.
                        AP击穿而没有伤害的bug会修复,这种情况一般是砸到防雷带上之后进一步穿到主装-而无法击穿所造成的。


                        IP属地:海南13楼2018-04-17 21:47
                        收起回复
                          -There are no plans to introduce operation for Tiers 2-4.But in the future, its likely to be added.
                          2-4级PVE暂时没有计划,未来大概会有吧


                          IP属地:海南14楼2018-04-17 21:47
                          收起回复
                            -There is no imbalance between teams when one gets 3hydro/radar and other gets 1 on 0. Statistics say that the odds of 50 to 50.
                            一边有3个水听/雷达船而另一边却只有1条或者没有水听/雷达船,这种情况很平衡。我们的统计表示基本上是数量均等的。


                            IP属地:海南15楼2018-04-17 21:48
                            回复(8)