也就那样谁都没赚到便宜英特尔的漏洞为什么amd跌了这么大的漏洞，英特尔用什么手段把股票拉回来的

干我何事

那我的e3v2呢

当硬件出现问题，弥补代价太大的时候该怎么办？
1. 拉同行下水
2. 不会影响用户体验
华为，你把刀放下，这次没有说你。

怪不得牙膏厂和按摩店合作了，拖下水

Why is this all done without any configuration options?
A *competent* CPU engineer would fix this by making sure speculation
doesn't happen across protection domains. Maybe even a L1 I$ that is
keyed by CPL.
I think somebody inside of Intel needs to really take a long hard look
at their CPU's, and actually admit that they have issues instead of
writing PR blurbs that say that everything works as designed.
.. and that really means that all these mitigation patches should be
written with "not all CPU's are crap" in mind.
Or is Intel basically saying "we are committed to selling you shit
forever and ever, and never fixing anything"?
Because if that's the case, maybe we should start looking towards the
ARM64 people more.
Please talk to management. Because I really see exactly two possibibilities:
- Intel never intends to fix anything
OR
- these workarounds should have a way to disable them.
Which of the two is it?
Linus

千万别修复 我可不想下降性能

结论打的太死了吧……Linux测试表明很多测试项目的性能只有个位数下降……

IO性能损失而已