【Website网站】Sex Sense - sexsence.ie Sex Sense is an educational website for teenagers aged 13 to 18. I chose to do this subject as sex education in Ireland needs to be modernized. It is too traditional and unwilling to include vital aspects of sex education. This is mainly due to the concern that if you tell teens too much it encourages them to be promiscuous. Due to this belief, teens will turn to their friends, pornography, the Internet and the media. These are unreliable sources, which inevitably leads to anxiety when the reality of sex and sexuality is discovered. Sex Sense aims to be a reliable source that is both appealing to the age group, while still treating the subject with the necessary sensitivity. It’s main objective is to build confidence around sexual identity. . By Ruby Henderson https://www.behance.net/gallery/18231329/Sex-Sense
话说,LS介个教育网站灰常不错,单单看本贴cover那张图里面所包含滴以下ta所涉及讨论的内容便可见端倪了…… . 1 Sex 性 2 Relationships (情感)关系 3 Your body 你的身体 4 Abuse 性滥用/暴力 5 STI's 性传播疾病 6 Sexual Orientation 性认同 7 Birth control 避免妊娠/避孕 8 Pornography 色情材料 . Sex is not a reflection of your value as aperson. 性并不能代表你的人格价值。 Different sexual orientations are natural.
The first few episodes of the series are extremely explicit, showing erect penises and close-ups of a vulva as well as detailed footage of sexual intercourse including penetration and ejaculation (both filmed with a tiny camera from within the vagina). In subsequent episodes, most such footage was heavily (and seemingly hastily) censored through blurring; however, the programme remains perhaps the most explicit ever to be broadcast on mainstream UK television. . After one of the more explicit scenes was uploaded to Google Video, it was discussed on the Internet before being quickly removed from the site. The segments remain available on several BitTorrent networks. . Twenty-one people complained to the national television regulator, Ofcom, that the explicitness of the sexual scenes breached obscenity and broadcasting regulations, but in their 29 January bulletin, Ofcom ruled that there was no rule banning the showing of genuine sexual acts on free-to-air television, and that "in [their] view the portrayal of sex in this programme genuinely sought to inform and educate", concluding that "whilst the visuals were explicit at times, nothing was transmitted in a manner that could be construed as having the potential to harm people under the age of eighteen", particularly given its context as a serious factual programme, and as such it was ruled that the episodes were not in breach of any broadcasting regulations.