公路车吧 关注:870,958贴子:30,132,525

一篇质疑自锁的文章,奇文共赏。

只看楼主收藏回复

原文出处 http://www.cyclorama.net/viewArticle.php?id=376&subjectId=9
节选自
THE SHOES RUSE
In this extract from his book JUST RIDE, Grant Petersen of Rivendell Bicycle Works explodes some of the myths surrounding clip-in pedals
The shoes ruse
A firm attachment to the pedals was helpful and almost necessary in the early days of bike racing, when all bikes had fixed gears (no freewheel, no coasting), and the gears were low by today’s standards. Then, once the racers got up to 18 miles per hour or so, they were spinning the pedals like human roadrunners, and if a foot came off the pedal, it was harder to slow the bike down and find the pedals again. Toe clips, straps, and cleats evolved to secure the foot and reduce the danger of runaway pedals, and eventually the freewheel eliminated that danger altogether. But by then, the clips and straps were entrenched, and there was no going back. By 1980, if you rode a bike and didn’t use toe clips, straps, and cleats, you weren’t serious.
Then, in the mid ’80s, LOOK—a ski boot and binding maker—introduced ski-binding technology to bikes, with the first popular clipless pedal-and-shoe system. Pro racers took to it, other manufacturers followed, and within three years virtually every road racer in the First World had converted. It spilled over to mountain-bike racing, and today even a few gullible commuters have adopted them. When I see ten-year-olds riding with clipless shoes and pedals, I fear for the future.
Proponents say:
With clipless, there’s more power to the pedal because it’s not being absorbed by a soft and flexible shoe sole.
With clipless, it’s easier to apply power all around the circular pedal stroke.
Neither is true, though.
As long as your pedals aren’t dinky - say, as long as they’re 2.5 x 3.5 inches, or about the size of a compact digital camera - any shoe does the job without flexing, because the shoe is supported by the pedal. If the pedal can’t flex, the shoe can’t - no matter how flexy it may be just out of the box. Besides, the part of your foot that’s behind the pedal can’t flex while you’re pedaling, because your foot mechanics won’t allow it.
The only riders who benefit from clipless pedals are racers, and only because their pedals are so small and slippery. If you don’t ride tiny, slippery pedals, you don’t need stiff, cleated shoes.
And the 360-degrees-of-power argument is just as weak. In studies where efficient, pro pedal-ers and lousy rookie pedalers have been hooked up to machines that measure muscle activity during pedaling, the machines tell us that nobody pulls up on the backstroke. The most efficient pedalers just push down less on the upward moving pedal than the rookies do. (They still push down on the upward-moving pedal - not a good thing, because effectively one leg is fighting the other - but the best pedalers push down less.) Now, if they don’t pull up, you don’t pull up, and if you don’t pull up, there’s no 360 degrees of power, and no biomechanical/physiological reason to lock your foot to the pedal.
The benefits of pedaling free far outweigh any real or imagined benefits of being locked in. They are as follows:
You can wear any casual shoe in your closet - whatever your mood, your outfit, and the weather calls for. You don’t have to go find your “cycling shoes” because you won’t have invested in techie two-hundred-dollar pedals that require them.
Your muscles last longer. Moving your foot about the pedal shifts the load, even if slightly, to different muscles, and spreads the load around. Sprint up hills on the balls of your feet and, on long-seated climbs, push with the pedal centered almost under your arch. It’s not a turbocharged, magic sweet spot, but it feels better and more natural, and you can’t do it if you’re locked in.
You reduce the chance of a repetitive stress injury, because your feet naturally move around more, changing your biomechanics.
You get off and on easier at stoplights; there’s no twisting to get out of your pedals, no fussing to get back in.
You can walk in stores without walking on your heels. You can run! You aren’t handicapped by expensive and weird-looking shoes.
Riding “free” isn’t new or revolutionary, and it’s not just a grumpy stab at the established order. It’s normal, it’s natural - it’s the way you rode as a kid, the way most of the planet rides, and the way you’d ride if you weren’t under the racing influence. Can you imagine yourself - after years or decades of perfectly uneventful happy riding in regular shoes and pedals - concluding that you’d be better off riding in shoes that didn’t work as well off the bike, or on pedals that required special shoes?
I know - of course - that it helps to be firmly attached to the pedal when you’re sprinting in the rain (your foot may slip off the pedals without a fixed connection), or hopping over a dead raccoon, or hiking the bike up over a curb without getting off. But giving up normal shoes for a few rare circumstances like these doesn’t make sense.
From JUST RIDE by Grant Petersen ISBN-13: 978-0761155584
Grant Petersen is founder and chief honcho at Rivendell Bike Works -http://www.rivbike.com


IP属地:北京1楼2015-11-06 15:29回复
    二楼站位等翻译


    IP属地:山东2楼2015-11-06 15:30
    收起回复
      2026-02-22 08:33:12
      广告
      不感兴趣
      开通SVIP免广告
      没弄完就发出去了,节选自
      JUST RIDE,
      整书有中文版,我就不单独翻译了。
      http://item.jd.com/11447172.html


      IP属地:北京3楼2015-11-06 15:30
      回复
        坐等翻译


        来自Android客户端4楼2015-11-06 15:30
        回复
          拉到下面发现还没翻译


          IP属地:上海来自iPhone客户端5楼2015-11-06 15:31
          回复
            打的一手好广告


            IP属地:广东来自iPhone客户端6楼2015-11-06 15:32
            回复
              坐等翻译


              来自Android客户端7楼2015-11-06 15:39
              回复
                买书看看


                8楼2015-11-06 15:42
                回复
                  2026-02-22 08:27:12
                  广告
                  不感兴趣
                  开通SVIP免广告
                  Ok, 好吧,我试试。
                  在自行车竞技早期时代,脚和踏板的牢固绑定曾经是非常有有帮助甚至是必须的。当时所有的自行车都是死飞,不能空滑的,而且齿比还很低。于是,当时速大于18mile的时候,登车的感觉就像走鹃(roadrunner)似的。此时一旦脚脱离的踏板,就很难减速或是重新找到踏板了。于是发展出了脚夹、绑带、脚笼这类的装置把踏板牢牢固定,防止脱离。
                  后来,由于棘轮的发明,这些危险不再存在。但是脚夹、绑带已经非常根深蒂固,一发不可收拾。到了1980年,如果你不用这些的话,那么你会被认为是不认真的。
                  到了80年代中期,LOOK,一个滑雪板生产商,将滑雪板固锁的技术引入到单车,发明了第一款流行的自锁系统。专业运动员纷纷采纳,其他厂商也跟进。仅用了3年时间,几乎所有的一流运动员都转入自锁了。这个风气很快影响山地车赛,到现在,连一些人云亦云的通勤者也在用自锁。当我看到10岁的孩子们用锁踏锁鞋的时候,我开始担心未来。。(未完)


                  IP属地:北京9楼2015-11-06 15:57
                  回复
                    鼓吹者说:
                    有了自锁,会有更大的能量传递到踏板,因为鞋底不再吸收能量。
                    有了自锁,一提一拉发力更加充分。
                    很遗憾,这都不是真的。
                    只要你的踏板不是特别小,比如2.5x3.5 inches,或者还没有名片大,什么鞋子都不至于弯曲泻力。因为鞋子是由踏板支撑的,如果踏板不弯曲,鞋就不会弯曲,不管它多软。此外,你采踏板的那一部分脚面也不会弯曲,同理。
                    唯一收益的骑行者是那些运动员们,而且仅仅是因为他们的踏板非常小非常滑。如果你不用非常小非常滑的踏板,那么也没有必要穿硬底的、上锁的鞋。
                    而“一推一拉”的那种说法也经不起推敲。研究表明,不管是专业选手还是菜鸟,通过机器监控他们的肌肉,显示,没有人在作提拉。最有效率的人只是在上升段用较小的力气踩而已(依然是向下用力的,两个腿还是有相对用力的成分,只是高手用力小一些)。所以,既然他们都不向上提,你也不会例外。不存在一推一拉,因此也就没有力学上的必要把脚锁住。
                    (未完)


                    IP属地:北京10楼2015-11-06 16:12
                    回复
                      一提一拉 效果自然 我不是卖洗发水广告


                      12楼2015-11-06 16:19
                      收起回复
                        另一方面,保持自由踩踏(不上锁)的好处远多于上锁:
                        你可以根据心情、天气穿你的任何一双鞋子,而不用去找你的锁鞋。
                        你的肌肉能坚持更久。脚在踏板上移动可以调节肌肉的受力,分散负载。冲刺时候用前脚掌,爬长坡可以用足弓。尽管不是总是所谓最佳的,但是却感觉更好,更自然。而上了锁就不能这样。
                        你会减少由往复运动带来的损伤的几率,因为你的脚会自动移动,自行调节。
                        你在红绿灯处会更容易停车,上下都毫不费力气。
                        你可以随意走进商店,不用拿脚后跟走路。你还可以跑,你不会因为你昂贵而外观诡异的锁鞋而变成残废。
                        (未完)


                        IP属地:北京13楼2015-11-06 16:21
                        回复
                          (待续)


                          IP属地:北京来自iPhone客户端14楼2015-11-06 16:26
                          回复
                            不管怎么样,反正上锁爽


                            IP属地:浙江来自Android客户端15楼2015-11-06 16:28
                            回复