RuckingFetard
Sun 13 Nov 2011 4:16 PM
UH, look really closely at the first one. The texture of the ground is continued onto the "structure"... It's not a structure at all, nothing is there. The lines are just the ground, but they have been brightened in some way. Probably a glitch with some sort of camera thing that I don't understand.
Second and third I have no idea wtf I'm looking at but it does not look like buildings.
嗯~仔细看第一张,地表的细节持续延伸到那所谓的“构造体”中,所以,那根本不是什么人造的,什么都没有,只是一些因为某种原因发出亮光的地表纹理罢了,可能是相机的故障导致的。
我闹不清楚第二张和第三张是他妈什么玩意儿,却是看起来像某种建筑。
Jonathan Hendry @RuckingFetard
I think the first one is water, the 'white' is reflected sunlight.
我觉得第一张是水体,因为反射阳光而显得发白。
RuckingFetard
@Jonathan Hendry
.. I don't think so. That would have to be very clear water, and the texture of the ground would have to have been replicated below the water as well, which doesn't make sense.
It might be some sort of thing happening with the flashes from the satellites.
我不这么认为,要是水体的话那得是相当干净的水,而且地面纹理也应该在水体之下表现出来,而这就讲不通了。估计卫星拍摄时那里恰好发生了某些事情。
Jonathan Hendry @RuckingFetard
Um, no, if the sunlight is reflecting, the clarity of the water doesn't matter, nor does what's under the water. All you see is the light reflected off the surface of the water. Texture in the white is probably places where dirt or debris or mud pushed up by vehicle tires is higher than the water.
嗯~不对,要是阳光反射的话,水体是否清澈是没关系的,更不要说能看到水下的什么东西了,你只能看到水面的反光,那些东西可能是被车辆的轮胎碾压推挤出来高于水体的灰尘泥土或碎屑,从而形成了河道。
RuckingFetard
@Jonathan Hendry
Take a look at it up close. The texture of the lighter stripes is clearly being continued from the darker spots. that would never happen if it were water.
仔细看上边,那些发亮的条带很明显是较暗区域的延伸,所以那绝不可能是水体。
Jonathan Hendry @RuckingFetard
It would, if the continuation was an elevated area that was above the water level.
那些延伸应该是高于水平面的部分。