刘邦吧 关注:11,205贴子:323,406
  • 27回复贴,共1

如何看待外网国人信吹垓下之战是刘邦自愿给韩信指挥?

只看楼主收藏回复

But the point is, it is absolutely absurd to link "Han Xin participating = becoming commander-in-chief who can order Liu Bang"—the fact is Liu Bang voluntarily delegated battle command to Han Xin because he knew his own incompetence in commanding large-scale campaigns (evidenced by his repeated defeats by Xiang Yu before). Han Xin’s command was authorized, not a "subject overriding ruler"; Liu Bang retained overall sovereignty but handed over tactical decision-making to the professional strategist, which has nothing to do with "title supremacy" which you keep on returning to.但关键在于,将“韩信参战=成为可以指挥刘邦的总司令”联系起来是极其荒谬的——事实是,刘邦主动将作战指挥权委托给韩信,因为他深知自己不擅长指挥大规模战役(此前他屡次败于项羽便可证明这一点)。韩信的指挥权是获得授权的,并非“臣民凌驾于君主之上”;刘邦保留了总体主权,但将战术决策权交给了这位专业的战略家,这与你反复提及的“头衔至上”毫无关系。[lbk]图片[rbk]


IP属地:湖北来自Android客户端1楼2026-01-29 08:32回复
    以图为证


    IP属地:湖北来自Android客户端2楼2026-01-29 08:32
    回复
      2026-03-16 01:02:19
      广告
      不感兴趣
      开通SVIP免广告
      直接给史记原文,是刘邦召来韩信参战的。
      汉欲西归,张良、陈平说曰:“汉有天下太半,而诸侯皆附之。楚兵罢食尽,此天亡楚之时也,不如因其机而遂取之。今释弗击,此所谓‘养虎自遗患’也。”汉王听之。乃使使告韩信、彭越曰:“并力击楚。楚破,自陈以东傅海与齐王,睢阳以北至谷城与彭相国。”使者至,韩信、彭越皆报曰:“请今进兵。”


      IP属地:江西来自Android客户端3楼2026-01-29 14:45
      收起回复
        其实挺不理解为什么很多人认真得把刘邦当废物


        IP属地:河南来自Android客户端4楼2026-01-30 10:35
        收起回复
          历史只是让想让你看到。 鸿门宴前驻守函谷关将领是谁?


          IP属地:广东来自iPhone客户端5楼2026-01-30 22:13
          回复
            我觉得垓下之战是谁指挥已经不重要了,我更想知道为什么开国功臣表里没有一个功侯被记载参加过垓下之战
            还有史记为什么不说明孔将军和费将军是谁,明明其他战役都会写清楚哪个将领立了什么功


            IP属地:福建6楼2026-02-19 16:59
            回复